Trambley v. Reliance GlobalCom Services, Inc., C 18-cv-05054-KAW. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190917986
Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 12, 2019
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff William Trambley and Defendant Reliance Globalcom Services, Inc. dba Global Cloud Xchange, a business form unknown, Does 1-25, inclusive, as this entire action is now settled, that this action now be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear the
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER KANDIS A. WESTMORE , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff William Trambley and Defendant Reliance Globalcom Services, Inc. dba Global Cloud Xchange, a business form unknown, Does 1-25, inclusive, as this entire action is now settled, that this action now be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear thei..
More
JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
KANDIS A. WESTMORE, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff William Trambley and Defendant Reliance Globalcom Services, Inc. dba Global Cloud Xchange, a business form unknown, Does 1-25, inclusive, as this entire action is now settled, that this action now be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs.
DATED: September 5, 2019 VALOR LEGAL
By: /s/Orestes A. Cross
Orestes A. Cross
Attorneys for Plaintiff
William Trambley
Dated: September 5, 2019. DLA Piper
By: /s/Margaret Keane
Margaret Keane
Attorneys for Defendant
Reliance Globalcom Services, Inc. dba Global
Cloud Xchange, a business form unknown,
Does, 1-25, inclusive.
FILER ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all signatories.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California and the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on September 4, 2019.
/s/Orestes A. Cross
Orestes A. Cross
[PROPOSED] ORDER
This matter is dismissed with prejudice under Rule 41(A)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Each Party shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
