Rademaker v. Paramo, 17-cv-02406-JLB-KSC. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190930a29
Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION [ECF No. 66] JILL L. BURKHARDT , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff's "Motion for the Defense to Pr[ovide] All Grievances as Ordered by the Court on February 4, 2019." (ECF No. 66.) Plaintiff appears to have filed this motion in the wrong case. Although Plaintiff wrote this case's number in the caption of his motion, it appears from the relief sought in the motion that Plaintiff meant to file it in Rademaker v. Juarez, et al., 18-cv-01831-W
Summary: ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION [ECF No. 66] JILL L. BURKHARDT , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff's "Motion for the Defense to Pr[ovide] All Grievances as Ordered by the Court on February 4, 2019." (ECF No. 66.) Plaintiff appears to have filed this motion in the wrong case. Although Plaintiff wrote this case's number in the caption of his motion, it appears from the relief sought in the motion that Plaintiff meant to file it in Rademaker v. Juarez, et al., 18-cv-01831-WQ..
More
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION
[ECF No. 66]
JILL L. BURKHARDT, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff's "Motion for the Defense to Pr[ovide] All Grievances as Ordered by the Court on February 4, 2019." (ECF No. 66.) Plaintiff appears to have filed this motion in the wrong case. Although Plaintiff wrote this case's number in the caption of his motion, it appears from the relief sought in the motion that Plaintiff meant to file it in Rademaker v. Juarez, et al., 18-cv-01831-WQH-AGS ("Juarez"). Additionally, Plaintiff filed the same motion in Juarez (Juarez, ECF No. 30), and it has already been ruled upon (Juarez, ECF No. 33).
The Court therefore STRIKES Plaintiff's motion. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court shall STRIKE ECF No. 66 from the docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
