Mays v. Commissioner of Social Security, 19-cv-01552-TSH. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20191008u56
Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 03, 2019
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE THOMAS S. HIXSON , Magistrate Judge . On September 4, 2019, Plaintiff Phillip Mays filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 23. Pursuant to the scheduling order in this case, the Commissioner's opposition or counter-motion was due within 28 days of service of Plaintiff's motion. ECF No. 10. As the Commissioner failed to file an opposition or counter-motion, the Court hereby ORDERS him to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with cour
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE THOMAS S. HIXSON , Magistrate Judge . On September 4, 2019, Plaintiff Phillip Mays filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 23. Pursuant to the scheduling order in this case, the Commissioner's opposition or counter-motion was due within 28 days of service of Plaintiff's motion. ECF No. 10. As the Commissioner failed to file an opposition or counter-motion, the Court hereby ORDERS him to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with court..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
THOMAS S. HIXSON, Magistrate Judge.
On September 4, 2019, Plaintiff Phillip Mays filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 23. Pursuant to the scheduling order in this case, the Commissioner's opposition or counter-motion was due within 28 days of service of Plaintiff's motion. ECF No. 10. As the Commissioner failed to file an opposition or counter-motion, the Court hereby ORDERS him to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with court deadlines. The Commissioner shall file a declaration by October 17, 2019. No chambers copy is required.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
