Ruiz v. Hatton, 17-cv-06706-EMC. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20191009g58
Visitors: 16
Filed: Oct. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY Docket No. 27. EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Petitioner filed a notice of appeal and requested a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). The application for a certificate of appealability is DENIED because Petitioner has not demonstrated that "jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right . . . ." Sl
Summary: ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY Docket No. 27. EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Petitioner filed a notice of appeal and requested a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). The application for a certificate of appealability is DENIED because Petitioner has not demonstrated that "jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right . . . ." Sla..
More
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
Docket No. 27.
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Petitioner filed a notice of appeal and requested a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). The application for a certificate of appealability is DENIED because Petitioner has not demonstrated that "jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right . . . ." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
The Clerk shall forward to the Court of Appeals the case file with this order. See United States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997).
This order disposes of Docket No. 27.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
