Gomez v. Logan, 17cv834-BAS-MDD. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20191010888
Visitors: 16
Filed: Oct. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 07, 2019
Summary: ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER MITCHELL D. DEMBIN , District Judge . On July 9, 2019, the Court held a Mandatory Settlement Conference and the case settled. ( See ECF No. 41). The Court understood the settlement to resolve the entire action. ( See id. ). However, the joint motions to dismiss did not request dismissal of the entire action. ( See ECF Nos. 42, 43). Accordingly, the parties are ORDERED to meet and confer regarding the status of the remaining Defendants—Defendant
Summary: ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER MITCHELL D. DEMBIN , District Judge . On July 9, 2019, the Court held a Mandatory Settlement Conference and the case settled. ( See ECF No. 41). The Court understood the settlement to resolve the entire action. ( See id. ). However, the joint motions to dismiss did not request dismissal of the entire action. ( See ECF Nos. 42, 43). Accordingly, the parties are ORDERED to meet and confer regarding the status of the remaining Defendants—Defendants..
More
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER
MITCHELL D. DEMBIN, District Judge.
On July 9, 2019, the Court held a Mandatory Settlement Conference and the case settled. (See ECF No. 41). The Court understood the settlement to resolve the entire action. (See id.). However, the joint motions to dismiss did not request dismissal of the entire action. (See ECF Nos. 42, 43). Accordingly, the parties are ORDERED to meet and confer regarding the status of the remaining Defendants—Defendants P. Logan, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, and R.J. Donovan Prison— and to file an appropriate joint motion on or before November 7, 2019. If the parties intended the settlement to resolve the entire action, the joint motion must indicate that the parties stipulate to dismissal of the entire action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
