Bird v. Saul, 3:19-cv-00757-JD. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20191011n18
Visitors: 22
Filed: Oct. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 10, 2019
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE JAMES DONATO , District Judge . In this social security review action, plaintiff Kristy Bird has failed to file any opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss, which was filed on July 11, 2019. Dkt. No. 10. Her response was due July 25, 2019. Civil L.R. 7-3(a). Plaintiff Bird is ordered to show cause in writing by October 25, 2019, why the case should not be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. FootNotes
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE JAMES DONATO , District Judge . In this social security review action, plaintiff Kristy Bird has failed to file any opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss, which was filed on July 11, 2019. Dkt. No. 10. Her response was due July 25, 2019. Civil L.R. 7-3(a). Plaintiff Bird is ordered to show cause in writing by October 25, 2019, why the case should not be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. FootNotes ..
More
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
JAMES DONATO, District Judge.
In this social security review action, plaintiff Kristy Bird has failed to file any opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss, which was filed on July 11, 2019. Dkt. No. 10. Her response was due July 25, 2019. Civil L.R. 7-3(a).
Plaintiff Bird is ordered to show cause in writing by October 25, 2019, why the case should not be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), the Court substitutes Andrew Saul, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, as defendant in this action.
Source: Leagle
