Center for Environmental Health v. Perdue, 18-cv-01763-RS (TSH). (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20191018943
Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 17, 2019
Summary: DISCOVERY ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 91 THOMAS S. HIXSON , Magistrate Judge . Concerning ECF No. 91, the privilege log for the documents Plaintiffs have selected states that documents 10 (OLPP_00143647) and 13 (OLPP_00142662) are redacted. However, from the in camera submission, the Court can't tell what was redacted. The Court ORDERS Defendants to resubmit these documents in camera in such a fashion that the Court can tell what was redacted. If the redactions are for some reason hard to depict,
Summary: DISCOVERY ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 91 THOMAS S. HIXSON , Magistrate Judge . Concerning ECF No. 91, the privilege log for the documents Plaintiffs have selected states that documents 10 (OLPP_00143647) and 13 (OLPP_00142662) are redacted. However, from the in camera submission, the Court can't tell what was redacted. The Court ORDERS Defendants to resubmit these documents in camera in such a fashion that the Court can tell what was redacted. If the redactions are for some reason hard to depict, ..
More
DISCOVERY ORDER
Re: Dkt. No. 91
THOMAS S. HIXSON, Magistrate Judge.
Concerning ECF No. 91, the privilege log for the documents Plaintiffs have selected states that documents 10 (OLPP_00143647) and 13 (OLPP_00142662) are redacted. However, from the in camera submission, the Court can't tell what was redacted. The Court ORDERS Defendants to resubmit these documents in camera in such a fashion that the Court can tell what was redacted. If the redactions are for some reason hard to depict, the Defendants can submit redacted and unredacted versions, and the Court can compare them. Defendants shall submit these documents in camera by October 21, 2019.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
