Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In re Facebook, Inc. Consumer Privacy User Profile Litigation, 18-md-02843-VC. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20191104c19 Visitors: 18
Filed: Nov. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 01, 2019
Summary: PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 27: QUESTIONS FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE VINCE CHHABRIA , District Judge . The parties should be prepared to discuss the following at the case management conference: Assume the Court grants Facebook's request to proceed with discovery on liability with respect to each named plaintiff before proceeding with discovery that would be related only to class certification. Can the parties offer further explanation of what Phase 1 discovery would look like What sort of disco
More

PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 27: QUESTIONS FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

The parties should be prepared to discuss the following at the case management conference: Assume the Court grants Facebook's request to proceed with discovery on liability with respect to each named plaintiff before proceeding with discovery that would be related only to class certification. Can the parties offer further explanation of what Phase 1 discovery would look like? What sort of discovery requests would be out of bounds during Phase 1? For example, would discovery be limited to an inquiry about which apps were able to access each named plaintiff's information as alleged in the complaint, or would it include an inquiry about which apps had access to user information in general? Would it be limited to an inquiry about what restrictions Facebook imposed on the particular apps that had access to the named plaintiffs' information, or would it include a general inquiry about the restrictions Facebook placed on apps? Is it even possible to determine which apps were given access to which users' information?

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer