Perine v. Cintas Corporation, C 19-05427 WHA (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20191118796
Visitors: 2
Filed: Nov. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 15, 2019
Summary: ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION TO DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The only defendant left in this action is United Airlines Inc. Both sides agree and stipulate that this Court lacks personal jurisdiction over United. Accordingly, United's motion to dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT. This order hereby transfers this action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio to be connected to Cintas Corporation, a related case. Ohio has sp
Summary: ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION TO DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The only defendant left in this action is United Airlines Inc. Both sides agree and stipulate that this Court lacks personal jurisdiction over United. Accordingly, United's motion to dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT. This order hereby transfers this action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio to be connected to Cintas Corporation, a related case. Ohio has spe..
More
ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION TO DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
The only defendant left in this action is United Airlines Inc. Both sides agree and stipulate that this Court lacks personal jurisdiction over United. Accordingly, United's motion to dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT. This order hereby transfers this action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio to be connected to Cintas Corporation, a related case. Ohio has specific personal jurisdiction over United because plaintiff claims that United designed the uniform at issue in conjunction with Cintas all in Ohio. The Clerk shall transfer this civil action in its entirety to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio and close our file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
