VLSI Technology LLC v. Intel Corporation, 17-cv-05671-BLF. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20191119873
Visitors: 2
Filed: Nov. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES ARE RELATED [Re: ECF 266] BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . The Court has considered Plaintiff's administrative motion to consider whether Intel Corporation v. Fortress Investment Group LLC et al, Case No. 5:19-cv-06856-EJD (an antitrust action) is related to the above-captioned action (a patent infringement action). ECF 266. The Court concludes that the cases are NOT related and therefore DENIES Plaintiff's administrati
Summary: ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES ARE RELATED [Re: ECF 266] BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . The Court has considered Plaintiff's administrative motion to consider whether Intel Corporation v. Fortress Investment Group LLC et al, Case No. 5:19-cv-06856-EJD (an antitrust action) is related to the above-captioned action (a patent infringement action). ECF 266. The Court concludes that the cases are NOT related and therefore DENIES Plaintiff's administrativ..
More
ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES ARE RELATED
[Re: ECF 266]
BETH LABSON FREEMAN, District Judge.
The Court has considered Plaintiff's administrative motion to consider whether Intel Corporation v. Fortress Investment Group LLC et al, Case No. 5:19-cv-06856-EJD (an antitrust action) is related to the above-captioned action (a patent infringement action). ECF 266.
The Court concludes that the cases are NOT related and therefore DENIES Plaintiff's administrative motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle