Palantir Technologies Inc. v. Abramowitz, 18-mc-80132-JSC (PJH). (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20191218c88
Visitors: 28
Filed: Dec. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY PENDING RESOLUTION OF RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE Re: Dkt. No. 71. PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . The court is in receipt of defendant Marc Abramowitz's administrative motion to stay Magistrate Judge Corley's November 22, 2019 Order (Dkt. 66 and 67) granting plaintiff's Title 28 U.S.C. 1782 application for discovery pending resolution of defendant's motion for relief from such order (Dkt. 70). Having DENIED defendant'
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY PENDING RESOLUTION OF RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE Re: Dkt. No. 71. PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . The court is in receipt of defendant Marc Abramowitz's administrative motion to stay Magistrate Judge Corley's November 22, 2019 Order (Dkt. 66 and 67) granting plaintiff's Title 28 U.S.C. 1782 application for discovery pending resolution of defendant's motion for relief from such order (Dkt. 70). Having DENIED defendant's..
More
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY PENDING RESOLUTION OF RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Re: Dkt. No. 71.
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.
The court is in receipt of defendant Marc Abramowitz's administrative motion to stay Magistrate Judge Corley's November 22, 2019 Order (Dkt. 66 and 67) granting plaintiff's Title 28 U.S.C. § 1782 application for discovery pending resolution of defendant's motion for relief from such order (Dkt. 70). Having DENIED defendant's motion for relief (Dkt. 72), the court DENIES this motion as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
