In re Midland Credit Management Inc. Telephone Consumer Protection Act Litigation, 11-md-2286-MMA (MDD) (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20191219a22
Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO LIFT STAY [Doc. No. 728] MICHAEL M. ANELLO , District Judge . Plaintiff Jeremy R. Johnson ("Johnson") filed a "motion for an Order lifting the stay of motion practice to permit Johnson to file a motion to amend his Complaint" under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2). 1 Doc. Doc. No. 728. at 1. The Court notes that there is no stay on motion practice currently in effect. Rather, this multidistrict litigation (MDL) has established common discovery param
Summary: ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO LIFT STAY [Doc. No. 728] MICHAEL M. ANELLO , District Judge . Plaintiff Jeremy R. Johnson ("Johnson") filed a "motion for an Order lifting the stay of motion practice to permit Johnson to file a motion to amend his Complaint" under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2). 1 Doc. Doc. No. 728. at 1. The Court notes that there is no stay on motion practice currently in effect. Rather, this multidistrict litigation (MDL) has established common discovery parame..
More
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO LIFT STAY
[Doc. No. 728]
MICHAEL M. ANELLO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Jeremy R. Johnson ("Johnson") filed a "motion for an Order lifting the stay of motion practice to permit Johnson to file a motion to amend his Complaint" under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2).1 Doc. Doc. No. 728. at 1. The Court notes that there is no stay on motion practice currently in effect. Rather, this multidistrict litigation (MDL) has established common discovery parameters and deadlines typical of a standard MDL to achieve "coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings." Doc. No. 1 at 2; see, e.g., Doc. Nos. 702, 725, 726. Accordingly, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Johnson's motion to lift the stay on motion practice. If Johnson wishes to file a motion to amend his Complaint, he must contact the undersigned's Chambers and obtain a hearing date prior to doing so.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Johnson failed to contact the undersigned's Chambers to obtain a hearing date before filing his motion. Johnson should review this District's Local Rules and the undersigned's Chambers Rules for proper motion practice procedures. See S.D. Cal. Civ. R. 7.1(b); Civ. Chambers R. II.
Source: Leagle
