Ely Holdings Limited v. O'Keeffe's, Inc., 18-cv-06721-JCS. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20191223996
Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL Re: Dkt. Nos. 91, 101 JOSEPH C. SPERO , Chief Magistrate Judge . Defendant moved to file under seal a report dated April 29, 2016 on the basis that Plaintiffs designated it as confidential. Dkt. 91. Plaintiffs moved to file under seal portions of their motion for relief from the protective order and two attachments thereto on the basis that those documents were designated as confidential by Defendant, or contained information so desig
Summary: ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL Re: Dkt. Nos. 91, 101 JOSEPH C. SPERO , Chief Magistrate Judge . Defendant moved to file under seal a report dated April 29, 2016 on the basis that Plaintiffs designated it as confidential. Dkt. 91. Plaintiffs moved to file under seal portions of their motion for relief from the protective order and two attachments thereto on the basis that those documents were designated as confidential by Defendant, or contained information so design..
More
ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL
Re: Dkt. Nos. 91, 101
JOSEPH C. SPERO, Chief Magistrate Judge.
Defendant moved to file under seal a report dated April 29, 2016 on the basis that Plaintiffs designated it as confidential. Dkt. 91. Plaintiffs moved to file under seal portions of their motion for relief from the protective order and two attachments thereto on the basis that those documents were designated as confidential by Defendant, or contained information so designated. Dkt. 101. Neither party filed a responsive declaration setting forth grounds for sealing within the time allowed by Civil Local Rule 79-5(e). Both motions to file under seal are therefore DENIED, and each party is ORDERED to file the material implicated by its motion in the public record no earlier than December 24, 2019, and no later than January 3, 2020. See Civ. L.R. 19-5(e)(2).1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Due to the intervening holidays, the Court extends slightly the time allowed to file public versions, which is normally ten days from the date of denial.
Source: Leagle
