Johnson v. Bright Summit LLC, 18-cv-07356-PJH. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20191223a16
Visitors: 17
Filed: Dec. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 24 PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within sixty days, with proof of service thereof on the opposing party, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoin
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 24 PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within sixty days, with proof of service thereof on the opposing party, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Re: Dkt. No. 24
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.
The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this court, within sixty days, with proof of service thereof on the opposing party, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.
If no certification is filed, after passage of sixty days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice. The parties may, of course, substitute a dismissal with prejudice at any time during this sixty day period.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
