Thissel v. Excelligence Learning Corporation, 19-cv-05421-SVK. (2020)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20200107b04
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 06, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 06, 2020
Summary: ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Re: Dkt. 16 SUSAN VAN KEULEN , Magistrate Judge . The Parties are scheduled for an initial case management conference on January 7, 2020. Dkt. 11. On January 6, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion to continue the case management conference. Dkt. 16. Plaintiff indicates that Defendant's deadline to file a responsive pleading is in late February and asks the Court to continue the case management conference. Id. at 2. Accordingly, the Court CO
Summary: ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Re: Dkt. 16 SUSAN VAN KEULEN , Magistrate Judge . The Parties are scheduled for an initial case management conference on January 7, 2020. Dkt. 11. On January 6, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion to continue the case management conference. Dkt. 16. Plaintiff indicates that Defendant's deadline to file a responsive pleading is in late February and asks the Court to continue the case management conference. Id. at 2. Accordingly, the Court CON..
More
ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Re: Dkt. 16
SUSAN VAN KEULEN, Magistrate Judge.
The Parties are scheduled for an initial case management conference on January 7, 2020. Dkt. 11. On January 6, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion to continue the case management conference. Dkt. 16. Plaintiff indicates that Defendant's deadline to file a responsive pleading is in late February and asks the Court to continue the case management conference. Id. at 2. Accordingly, the Court CONTINUES the case management conference to March 17, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. The Parties are to file a joint case management conference statement by March 10, 2020.
Additionally, this case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case and to comply with that General Order if applicable.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
