Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DSS Technology Management, Inc. v. Apple Inc., 14-cv-05330 HSG. (2020)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20200116b65 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 15, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 15, 2020
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION TO SUBMIT PRETRIAL FILINGS HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, 7-1(a)(5), and 7-12, Plaintiff DSS Technology Management, Inc. ("DSS") and Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple") (collectively, the "Parties"), through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows regarding the submission of the pretrial filings: WHEREAS, on January 16, 2019, the Court entered a Scheduling Order setting the P
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION TO SUBMIT PRETRIAL FILINGS

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, 7-1(a)(5), and 7-12, Plaintiff DSS Technology Management, Inc. ("DSS") and Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple") (collectively, the "Parties"), through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows regarding the submission of the pretrial filings:

WHEREAS, on January 16, 2019, the Court entered a Scheduling Order setting the Pretrial Conference for January 28, 2020 at 3:00 p.m. and Jury Selection/Jury Trial for February 24, 2020 at 8:30 a.m. (Dkt. 183);

WHEREAS, on December 4, 2019, the clerk issued a notice that the Pretrial Conference, previously set for January 28, 2020, is continued to February 4, 2020, at 3:00 p.m., but pretrial filings are due based on the original not the continued pretrial conference date (Dkt. 357);

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Civil Pretrial And Trial Standing Order For Cases Before District Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., January 14, 2020 is the deadline for the Parties to submit to the Court the pretrial filings pursuant to ¶¶ 6-15 and ¶¶ 23-26 of Judge Gilliam's Pretrial Standing Order (i.e., the joint pretrial statement and proposed order, proposed jury instructions, proposed voir dire questions, proposed statement of the case, trial briefs and oppositions to motions in limine);

WHEREAS, on January 10, 2020, the Parties submitted a stipulation to extend the deadline for the Parties to submit a proposed joint set of jury instructions along with one-page explanations as to disputed instructions, by one week, to January 21, 2020 (Dkt. 411) and the Court granted that stipulation on January 13, 2020 (Dkt. 412);

WHEREAS, on January 14, 2020, the Court denied DSS' motion to amend infringement contentions and granted Apple's cross-motion to strike DSS' infringement expert report and set a Further Case Management Conference for January 21, 2020 (Dkt. 413);

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred and agree that in light of the Court's January 14, 2020 Order and scheduling of the January 21, 2020 Further Case Management Conference, the pretrial filings which are due on January 14 and 21, 2020, should be extended until January 24, 2020, which is after the Further Case Management Conference;

WHEREAS, the extension of the pretrial filing deadlines to January 24, 2020 will not alter the date of any other event or any deadline already set by this Court in this case.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), concurrence to the filing of this document was obtained from Niky Bagley, counsel for DSS Technology Management, Inc., on January 14, 2020.

Dated: January 14, 2020 DLA PIPER LLP (US) By /s/Summer Torrez MARK D. FOWLER CLAYTON THOMPSON YAKOV M. ZOLOTOREV ERIN P. GIBSON SUSAN ACQUISTA SUMMER TORREZ JONATHAN HICKS ERIN MCLAUGHLIN PETER MAGGIORE Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. Dated: January 14, 2020 BUETHER JOE & CARPENTER, LLC By /s/Niky Bagley CHRISTOPHER M. JOE ERIC W. BUETHER BRIAN A. CARPENTER NIKY BAGLEY KENNETH KULA Attorneys for Plaintiff DSS Technology Management, Inc.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer