Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ashtiani v. Applied Materials Inc., 20-cv-00463-NC. (2020)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20200130a50 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jan. 29, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 29, 2020
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE REASSIGNED TO SAN FRANCISCO/OAKLAND DIVISION NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Applied Materials, Inc., removed this case from Alameda County Superior Court and selected "San Jose" in the "Divisional Assignment" section of the civil cover sheet. Dkt. No. 1 at Ex. 1. Under 28 U.S.C. 1441(a), removal from state to federal court should be to "the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the plac
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE REASSIGNED TO SAN FRANCISCO/OAKLAND DIVISION

Defendant Applied Materials, Inc., removed this case from Alameda County Superior Court and selected "San Jose" in the "Divisional Assignment" section of the civil cover sheet. Dkt. No. 1 at Ex. 1. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a), removal from state to federal court should be to "the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where such action is pending." (Emphasis added). Under Civil Local Rule 3-2(d), "all civil actions which arise in the count[y] of Alameda . . . shall be assigned to the San Francisco Division or the Oakland Division" of the Northern District of California. The Court hereby orders defendant Applied Materials to show cause by February 5, 2020 why, under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a) and Civil Local Rule 3-2(d), it should not reassign this case to the San Francisco or Oakland Division.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer