Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. ResMed, Inc., 16-CV-1988 W (AHG). (2020)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20200204a23 Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 03, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 03, 2020
Summary: ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL [DOC. 65] THOMAS J. WHELAN , District Judge . Parties have filed a joint motion for partial dismissal. [Doc. 65.] Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the joint motion as follows: 1. The Relator's claims under the various qui tam statutes pled in this Civil Action as to ResMed, Inc. and ResMed, Corp. are dismissed with prejudice. 2. The Settling States of Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Io
More

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL [DOC. 65]

Parties have filed a joint motion for partial dismissal. [Doc. 65.] Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the joint motion as follows:

1. The Relator's claims under the various qui tam statutes pled in this Civil Action as to ResMed, Inc. and ResMed, Corp. are dismissed with prejudice. 2. The Settling States of Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington's claims as to the Covered Conduct as defined in the State Settlement Agreements are dismissed with prejudice; 3. All other claims of the Settling States are dismissed without prejudice; 4. Connecticut, Hawaii, and the District of Columbia's claims in this Civil Action are dismissed without prejudice.

Based on the foregoing, the Clerk is ordered to close the case file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer