Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ricker v. Salas, 19-cv-807-DMS-LL. (2020)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20200205d25 Visitors: 15
Filed: Feb. 03, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 03, 2020
Summary: ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND (2) DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS DANA M. SABRAW , District Judge . On May 1, 2019, Plaintiff Phillip Ricker, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint under (1) Cal. Gov. Code 844.6(d); (2) the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution; and (3) the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. 1983; (4), Cal. Gov. Code 844.6(d). Plaintiff alleges his rights were violated while he was housed at Richard J. Dono
More

ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND (2) DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

On May 1, 2019, Plaintiff Phillip Ricker, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint under (1) Cal. Gov. Code § 844.6(d); (2) the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution; and (3) the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983; (4), Cal. Gov. Code § 844.6(d). Plaintiff alleges his rights were violated while he was housed at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility.

On September 23, 2019, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. On October 25, 2019, the parties filed a joint motion to amend Plaintiff's complaint. The Court granted the joint motion and allowed for amended pleading.

On November 13, 2019, Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") on the motion to dismiss, recommending that it be denied as moot given the Order allowing for amended pleading.

This Court, having reviewed de novo the Magistrate Judge's R&R, adopts the R&R in its entirety and denies Defendants' motion to dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer