Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McAllister v. United States, 3:19-cv-01490-MMA-AHG. (2020)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20200220a53 Visitors: 18
Filed: Feb. 19, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 19, 2020
Summary: In Admiralty ORDER: (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING PART JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION CONFERENCE AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; and (2) RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR 9:00 AM AND MODIFYING IT TO BE TELEPHONIC AND ATTORNEYS-ONLY [ECF No. 34] ALLISON H. GODDARD , Magistrate Judge . On the parties' Joint Motion, the Court previously vacated the Early Neutral Evaluation Conference ("ENE") and Case Management Conference ("CMC") in this matter in light of the
More

In Admiralty

ORDER:

(1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING PART JOINT MOTION TO CONTINUE EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION CONFERENCE AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; and

(2) RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR 9:00 AM AND MODIFYING IT TO BE TELEPHONIC AND ATTORNEYS-ONLY

[ECF No. 34]

On the parties' Joint Motion, the Court previously vacated the Early Neutral Evaluation Conference ("ENE") and Case Management Conference ("CMC") in this matter in light of the United States' filing of a Third-Party Complaint against "K" Line RoRo Bulk Ship Management Co., Ltd. ("K Line"), Belocean Shipping, S.A. ("Belocean"), and vessel SHANGHAI HIGHWAY, in rem (collectively, "Third-Party Defendants"), and the need for the Third-Party Defendants to be able to participate in the ENE and CMC. ECF No. 16. The Court later reset the ENE and CMC for March 6, 2020. ECF No. 27.

On December 30, 2019, Third-Party Defendants filed their responsive pleadings, along with a separately filed crossclaim and counterclaim against the United States. See ECF Nos. 23, 24, 26. The Court then granted leave to Plaintiff to file a Second Amended Complaint naming the Third-Party Defendants directly, which Plaintiff did on January 2, 2020. ECF Nos. 28, 29. Both Plaintiff and the United States contend that the vessel SHANGHAI HIGHWAY was traveling too fast in the San Diego Bay, resulting in excessive wake that caused the incident underlying this litigation—namely, the sudden and violent movement of the gangway on the U.S. Navy warship U.S.S. MAKIN ISLAND and Plaintiff's subsequent injuries. See ECF No. 34 at 2.

K Line and Belocean have now filed all relevant responsive pleadings, and they contend that the vessel SHANGHAI HIGHWAY was not responsible for producing an excessive wake and was not traveling at an unsafe speed. Further, K Line and Belocean assert that another vessel, MARJORIE C, passed the U.S.S. MAKIN ISLAND at the time of the alleged incident. Based on this new information, Plaintiff intends to seek leave to amend his complaint once more. Id. at 3. Therefore, the parties request another continuance of the ENE and CMC until June 5, 2020 because they "agree that no productive settlement discussions can occur without the participation of these new defendants and some initial discovery." Id.

Having reviewed the Joint Motion and being fully advised, the Court agrees that the ENE should be continued to allow the participation of all parties in early settlement discussions. Therefore, the March 6, 2020 ENE is hereby VACATED and RESET for June 10, 20201 at 9:30 AM in the chambers of Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard, located on the third floor of the Edward J. Schwartz U.S. Courthouse, 221 West Broadway, Suite 3142, San Diego, California 92101. Do not report to Courtroom 3B; report to Chambers. Counsel for any non-English speaking party is responsible for arranging for the appearance of an interpreter at the conference.

The Court RESETS the related deadlines as follows:

1. Confidential ENE Statements Required: No later than June 5, 2020, the parties shall submit confidential statements of five (5) pages or less directly to the chambers of Magistrate Judge Goddard outlining the nature of the case, the claims, and the defenses. These statements shall not be filed or served on opposing counsel. They shall be lodged via email at efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov. The ENE statement is limited to five (5) pages or less, and up to five (5) pages of exhibits or declarations. Each party's ENE statement must outline: A. the nature of the case and the claims, B. position on liability or defense, C. position regarding settlement of the case with a specific2 demand/offer for settlement,3 and D. any previous settlement negotiations or mediation efforts.

However, the Court does not agree that it is necessary that any defendants that Plaintiff may be permitted to name in a future complaint be present at the CMC to participate in setting the discovery schedule and pretrial deadlines. Pretrial and discovery deadlines follow a broadly uniform schedule in all cases. Moreover, the setting of discovery deadlines in this case has already been delayed significantly by a three-month continuance of the CMC from December to March, and the Court is not amenable to delaying the issuance of a Scheduling Order by yet another three months. Moreover, the parties have already timely filed their Joint Discovery Plan on February 18, 2020 (ECF No. 33) and intend to comply with the Court-ordered deadline of February 28, 2020 to serve initial disclosures. See ECF No. 34 at 3. Therefore, the Court will keep the CMC on calendar for March 6, 2020, but will RESET the CMC for 9:00 AM and modify it to be telephonic and attorneys-only. Counsel shall call the chambers teleconference line at 1-877-873-8018 and use 8367902 as the access code to join the conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The parties requested that the ENE be reset for June 5, 2020. However, that date is unavailable on the Court's calendar.
2. A general statement, such as that a party "will negotiate in good faith," is a not a specific demand or offer.
3. If a specific demand or offer cannot be made at the time the ENE statement is submitted, then the reasons as to why a demand or offer cannot be made must be stated. Further, the party must explain when they will be in a position to state a demand or offer.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer