Lefiell v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 18-cv-00522-SI (SI). (2020)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20200225790
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 24, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 24, 2020
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . The remaining parties to the action, plaintiff and defendant City of Martinez, by their counsel, have advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. However, that if any party hereto certifies to this court, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, within ninety days from the date hereof, that settlement has not in fact occurre
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . The remaining parties to the action, plaintiff and defendant City of Martinez, by their counsel, have advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. However, that if any party hereto certifies to this court, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, within ninety days from the date hereof, that settlement has not in fact occurred..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
The remaining parties to the action, plaintiff and defendant City of Martinez, by their counsel, have advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. However, that if any party hereto certifies to this court, with proof of service of a copy thereon on opposing counsel, within ninety days from the date hereof, that settlement has not in fact occurred, the foregoing order shall be vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar for further proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
