Loop AI Labs, Inc. v. Gatti, 15-cv-00798-HSG. (2020)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20200226879
Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 25, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 25, 2020
Summary: ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION Re: Dkt. No. 1027 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Defendant IQSystem, Inc. filed a request for clarification of the Court's March 7, 2017 Order imposing terminating sanctions on Plaintiff. See Dkt. No. 1027. The Court DENIES Defendant's request, because nothing in its March 7, 2017 Order in any way changed the May 9, 2016 Order granting Plaintiff fees based on the SLAPP motion. See Dkt. No. 993. The Court also reiterates that Valeri
Summary: ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION Re: Dkt. No. 1027 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Defendant IQSystem, Inc. filed a request for clarification of the Court's March 7, 2017 Order imposing terminating sanctions on Plaintiff. See Dkt. No. 1027. The Court DENIES Defendant's request, because nothing in its March 7, 2017 Order in any way changed the May 9, 2016 Order granting Plaintiff fees based on the SLAPP motion. See Dkt. No. 993. The Court also reiterates that Valeria..
More
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION
Re: Dkt. No. 1027
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.
Defendant IQSystem, Inc. filed a request for clarification of the Court's March 7, 2017 Order imposing terminating sanctions on Plaintiff. See Dkt. No. 1027. The Court DENIES Defendant's request, because nothing in its March 7, 2017 Order in any way changed the May 9, 2016 Order granting Plaintiff fees based on the SLAPP motion. See Dkt. No. 993.
The Court also reiterates that Valeria C. Healy is not admitted to practice in any case before the undersigned. Id. at 30 ("[T]he Court exercises its discretion to revoke Healy's pro hac vice admission in this case and will not grant such admission in any future cases before the undersigned."). She thus is not permitted to file documents on behalf of Plaintiff, and should not do so again. In addition, Ira Leshin has not filed a Notice of Appearance before this Court, and will not be permitted to evade the local rules going forward by having prior counsel file documents in this case. See Local Rule 5-1(c)(2).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
