City of Escondido v. General Reinsurance Corporation, 19-cv-868-MMA (BGS). (2020)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20200228e49
Visitors: 1
Filed: Feb. 27, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2020
Summary: ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS [Doc. No. 36]. MICHAEL M. ANELLO , District Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, the parties jointly move to dismiss Plaintiff City of Escondido's Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") and Defendant General Reinsurance Corporation's counterclaim with prejudice. See Doc. No. 36. Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the parties' joint motion and DISMISSES the SAC and counterclaim with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own cost
Summary: ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS [Doc. No. 36]. MICHAEL M. ANELLO , District Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, the parties jointly move to dismiss Plaintiff City of Escondido's Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") and Defendant General Reinsurance Corporation's counterclaim with prejudice. See Doc. No. 36. Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the parties' joint motion and DISMISSES the SAC and counterclaim with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs..
More
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS
[Doc. No. 36].
MICHAEL M. ANELLO, District Judge.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, the parties jointly move to dismiss Plaintiff City of Escondido's Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") and Defendant General Reinsurance Corporation's counterclaim with prejudice. See Doc. No. 36. Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the parties' joint motion and DISMISSES the SAC and counterclaim with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees. The Court ORDERS the Clerk of Court to terminate this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
