Artifex Software, Inc. v. Siemens Product Lifecycle Management Software Inc., 19-cv-05764-PJH. (2020)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20200306b46
Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 05, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 05, 2020
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE PARTIES TO REFILE AN AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 26 PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . The court is in receipt of the parties' "Stipulated [Proposed] Interim Protective Order." Dkt. 26. Sections 9(b)-(c) of the Northern District of California's Model Protective Order for Standard Litigation ("Model Order") allow a non-party certain protections concerning its confidential and contractually-protected information that is in the possession of a party and subje
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE PARTIES TO REFILE AN AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 26 PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON , District Judge . The court is in receipt of the parties' "Stipulated [Proposed] Interim Protective Order." Dkt. 26. Sections 9(b)-(c) of the Northern District of California's Model Protective Order for Standard Litigation ("Model Order") allow a non-party certain protections concerning its confidential and contractually-protected information that is in the possession of a party and subjec..
More
ORDER DIRECTING THE PARTIES TO REFILE AN AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Re: Dkt. No. 26
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.
The court is in receipt of the parties' "Stipulated [Proposed] Interim Protective Order." Dkt. 26. Sections 9(b)-(c) of the Northern District of California's Model Protective Order for Standard Litigation ("Model Order") allow a non-party certain protections concerning its confidential and contractually-protected information that is in the possession of a party and subject to production in an action. The proposed order deletes those sections and, based on the court's review, provides no substitute in their place.
The court DENIES the parties' proposed order (Dkt. 26) and ORDERS that the parties refile a materially identical proposed order that reinserts materially similar language to Sections 9(b)-(c) of the Model Order. Except that addition, the parties shall not make any other changes to the proposed order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
