Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Soler v. County of San Diego, 3:14-cv-02470-MMA-RBB. (2020)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20200306b58 Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 05, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 05, 2020
Summary: ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED REQUEST TO PERMIT TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE [ECF NO. 215] RUBEN B. BROOKS , Magistrate Judge . Defendants Wilkins and Hobbs have filed an unopposed Request to Permit Telephonic Appearance of Defendants' Representative at the Settlement Conference. Good cause having been shown, the Request to Permit Telephonic Appearance of Defendants' settlement representative at the Mandatory Settlement Conference scheduled for March 18, 2020 is GRANTED. Defendants Wilkins and Hobb
More

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED REQUEST TO PERMIT TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE

[ECF NO. 215]

Defendants Wilkins and Hobbs have filed an unopposed Request to Permit Telephonic Appearance of Defendants' Representative at the Settlement Conference. Good cause having been shown, the Request to Permit Telephonic Appearance of Defendants' settlement representative at the Mandatory Settlement Conference scheduled for March 18, 2020 is GRANTED.

Defendants Wilkins and Hobbs' settlement representative is permitted to appear telephonically at the March 18, 2020 Mandatory Settlement Conference. On March 18, 2020 at 10:00 a.m., Defendants' representative with settlement authority shall remain on telephone standby during the course of the conference.

If the absence of Defendants' representative presents any impediment to settlement, the Court will reconvene the Settlement Conference and will require Defendants' representative to appear in person. This Order does not excuse the appearance of any other named party or client representative.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer