Navigators Specialty Ins. Co. v. Depomed, Inc., 4:19-cv-00255-HSG. (2020)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20200313b63
Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 12, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2020
Summary: STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITS WITH RESPECT TO CROSS-MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER [LOCAL RULE 7-11] HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 7-11, Defendant and Cross-Complainant Depomed Inc., n/k/a Assertio Therapeutics, Inc. ("Depomed") hereby moves for an order enlarging page limits with respect to the parties' forthcoming Cross-Motions for Partial Summary Judgment on the Duty to Defend. This administrative motion is stipu
Summary: STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITS WITH RESPECT TO CROSS-MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER [LOCAL RULE 7-11] HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule 7-11, Defendant and Cross-Complainant Depomed Inc., n/k/a Assertio Therapeutics, Inc. ("Depomed") hereby moves for an order enlarging page limits with respect to the parties' forthcoming Cross-Motions for Partial Summary Judgment on the Duty to Defend. This administrative motion is stipul..
More
STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ENLARGE PAGE LIMITS WITH RESPECT TO CROSS-MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER
[LOCAL RULE 7-11]
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-11, Defendant and Cross-Complainant Depomed Inc., n/k/a Assertio Therapeutics, Inc. ("Depomed") hereby moves for an order enlarging page limits with respect to the parties' forthcoming Cross-Motions for Partial Summary Judgment on the Duty to Defend. This administrative motion is stipulated, as set forth on the accompanying Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. The parties request:
1. That Depomed be granted ten (10) additional pages for its Motion, such that its page limitation would be thirty-five (35) pages;
2. That Plaintiff Navigators Specialty Insurance Company ("Navigators") be granted ten (10) additional pages for its Response to the Motion and Cross-Motion, such that its page limitation would be forty (40) pages;
3. That Depomed be granted an additional five (5) pages for its Reply in support of its Motion and Opposition to Navigators' Cross-Motion, such that its page limitation would be twenty-five (25) pages; and
4. That Navigators be granted an additional five (5) pages for its Reply in support of its Cross-Motion, such that its page limitation would be twenty (20) pages.
Good cause exists to enlarge the page limits with respect to the Cross-Motions. First, because the papers will address both Depomed's Motion and Navigators' Cross-Motion, it is appropriate and efficient for the parties to have additional pages to address all issues that are raised. Second, while each party believes that the facts relevant to its Motion or Cross-Motion are undisputed, the underlying facts are nevertheless complex, and concern three insurance policies, 182 underlying lawsuits, construction of various policy provisions, and whether Depomed provided notice to Navigators within the relevant policy periods. The additional pages are requested in order to address these issues thoroughly.
For the foregoing reasons, Depomed respectfully requests that the Court grant this administrative motion and enlarge the parties' page limits as set forth in the accompanying Stipulation and Proposed Order.
DATED: March 11, 2020 MASLON LLP
By: /s/ Margaret S. Brownell
Margaret S. Brownell
Attorney for Defendant and Counter-Claimant
DEPOMED, INC. n/k/a ASSERTIO
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
DENIED.
Source: Leagle
