Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Creswell Trading Co., Inc. v. United States, Slip Op. 98-87. Court. No. 91-01-00012 (1998)

Court: United States Court of International Trade Number: Slip Op. 98-87. Court. No. 91-01-00012 Visitors: 8
Judges: Dicarlo
Filed: Jun. 24, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: 4 F. Supp. 2d 1264 (1998) CRESWELL TRADING CO., INC., South Bay Foundry 1989, D & L Supply Co., Southern Star, Inc., City Pipe & Foundry, Inc., Capitol Foundry of Virginia, Inc., Virginia Precast Corp., and Techsales, Inc., Plaintiffs, Crescent Foundry Co. P. Ltd., Select Steels, Ltd., Rsi (India) Pvt. Ltd., Kejriwal Iron & Steel Works, Govind Steel Co., Ltd., R.B. Agarwalla & Co., Serampore Industries P. Ltd., Super Castings (India), Carnation Enterprises P. Ltd., Uma Iron & Steel Co., and Comm
More
4 F. Supp. 2d 1264 (1998)

CRESWELL TRADING CO., INC., South Bay Foundry 1989, D & L Supply Co., Southern Star, Inc., City Pipe & Foundry, Inc., Capitol Foundry of Virginia, Inc., Virginia Precast Corp., and Techsales, Inc., Plaintiffs,
Crescent Foundry Co. P. Ltd., Select Steels, Ltd., Rsi (India) Pvt. Ltd., Kejriwal Iron & Steel Works, Govind Steel Co., Ltd., R.B. Agarwalla & Co., Serampore Industries P. Ltd., Super Castings (India), Carnation Enterprises P. Ltd., Uma Iron & Steel Co., and Commex Corp., Plaintiffs-Intervenors,
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant,
Allegheny Foundry Co., Campbell Foundry, Co., Deeter Foundry, Inc., East Jordan Iron Works, Inc., Lebaron Foundry, Inc., Municipal Castings, Inc., Neenah Foundry Co., Pinkerton Foundry, Inc., U.S. Foundry & Manufacturing Co., Vulcan Foundry, Inc., and Alhambra Foundry, Inc., Defendants-Intervenors.

Slip Op. 98-87. Court. No. 91-01-00012.

United States Court of International Trade.

June 24, 1998.

ORDER

DiCARLO, Senior Judge.

In accordance with the decision (April 16, 1998) and mandate (June 8, 1998) of the *1265 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appeal Nos. 97-1486 and 97-1487, affirming-in-part and reversing-in-part this court's decision in Creswell Trading Co. v. United States, 21 CIT ___, 964 F. Supp. 409 (1997) [hereinafter Creswell V], it is hereby

ORDERED that the portion of this court's opinion and order in Creswell V holding that oceanic shipping costs did not constitute countervailable subsidies is vacated, and it is further

ORDERED that Commerce shall recalculate the countervailing subsidy conferred and issue new final results consistent with the opinion of the appellate court. Remand results are due within thirty days of the date this order is entered. It is further

ORDERED that any party contesting the results shall file comments or responses within thirty days of the remand results, after which Commerce will have fifteen days in which to file a reply.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer