Filed: Jan. 24, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Slip Op. 01 - 6 J U D G M E N T UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE Thomas J. Aquilino, Jr., Judge - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x CRESCENT FOUNDRY CO. PVT. LTD. et al., : Plaintiffs, : v. : Court No. 95-09-01239 : UNITED STATES, : Defendant. : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x The plaintiffs having interposed a motion pursuant to CIT Rule 56.2 for judgment upon the record compiled by the Interna- tional Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce ("ITA") sub nom. Ce
Summary: Slip Op. 01 - 6 J U D G M E N T UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE Thomas J. Aquilino, Jr., Judge - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x CRESCENT FOUNDRY CO. PVT. LTD. et al., : Plaintiffs, : v. : Court No. 95-09-01239 : UNITED STATES, : Defendant. : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x The plaintiffs having interposed a motion pursuant to CIT Rule 56.2 for judgment upon the record compiled by the Interna- tional Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce ("ITA") sub nom. Cer..
More
Slip Op. 01 - 6
J U D G M E N T
UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
Thomas J. Aquilino, Jr., Judge
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
CRESCENT FOUNDRY CO. PVT. LTD. et al., :
Plaintiffs, :
v. : Court No. 95-09-01239
:
UNITED STATES,
:
Defendant.
:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
The plaintiffs having interposed a motion pursuant to CIT
Rule 56.2 for judgment upon the record compiled by the Interna-
tional Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce ("ITA")
sub nom. Certain Iron-Metal Castings From India: Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 60 Fed.Reg. 44,849 (Aug.
29, 1995), aff'd in part, remanded in part sub nom. Crescent
Foundry Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. United States, 20 CIT 1469, 951 F. Supp.
252 (1996), remand results aff'd, 21 CIT 696,
969 F. Supp. 1341
(1997), aff'd in part, rev'd in part,
168 F.3d 1322 (Fed.Cir.
1998), remanded, 23 CIT , Slip Op. 99-5 (Jan. 8, 1999), second
remand results remanded, 24 CIT , Slip Op. 00-21 (Feb. 18,
2000); and this court in slip opinion 00-148, 24 CIT (Nov. 9,
2000), having remanded to the ITA its remand results dated May 24,
Court No. 95-09-01239 Page 2
2000 and stated to be pursuant to slip opinion 00-21 in order to
eliminate the influence of rebates under India's International
Price Reimbursement Scheme and Cash Compensatory Support program on
the calculation of any subsidy under ยง80HHC of India's Income Tax
Act; and the ITA having filed herein its Final Results of
Redetermination on Remand dated December 11, 2000 and stated to be
pursuant to slip opinion 00-148; and this court having reviewed
those Final Results and not having received any comments thereon or
opposition thereto from any party to this case; Now therefore,
after due deliberation, it is
ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the ITA's Final
Results of Redetermination on Remand dated December 11, 2000 be,
and they hereby are, affirmed.
Dated: New York, New York
January 24, 2001
________________________________
Judge
