Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United States, 99-06-00361 (2002)

Court: United States Court of International Trade Number: 99-06-00361 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 12, 2002
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Slip Op. 02-147 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE _ : ALLEGHENY LUDLUM CORP. et al., : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : Before: WALLACH, Judge UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Court No.: 99-06-00361 : Defendant. : : _: JUDGMENT ORDER Upon consideration of the Consent Motion for Judgment After Remand (“Consent Motion”), this Court having received and reviewed the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administrations’s (“Commerce”) Views of the Commission on Remand, and Commerce ha
More
Slip Op. 02-147 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE ____________________________________ : ALLEGHENY LUDLUM CORP. et al., : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : Before: WALLACH, Judge UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Court No.: 99-06-00361 : Defendant. : : ____________________________________: JUDGMENT ORDER Upon consideration of the Consent Motion for Judgment After Remand (“Consent Motion”), this Court having received and reviewed the United States Department of Commerce, International Trade Administrations’s (“Commerce”) Views of the Commission on Remand, and Commerce having complied with the Court’s Remand Order; the Plaintiff having moved for judgment and the Defendant having consented, and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that Commerce’s Remand Determination is in accordance with this Court’s Remand Order of June 18, 2002 and is AFFIRMED; and it is further ORDERED that the Consent Motion is GRANTED. __________________________ Evan J. W allach, Judge Dated: December 12, 2002 New York, New York ERRATA Allegheny Ludlum Corp., et al., v. United States, Court No. 99-06-00361, Slip Op. 02-147, Dated December 12, 2002. • Lines 2 and 3: Delete the words “Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“Commerce”)” and replace with “International Trade Commission’s (the “Commission”)” • Line 4: Delete word “Commerce” and replace with “the Commission” • Line 6: Delete word “Commerce’s” and replace with “the Commission’s” December 18, 2002
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer