SAYLER v. VARGO AND JANSON PC, 11-cv-02047-WYD-KLM. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20120113904
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 12, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 12, 2012
Summary: ORDER WILEY Y. DANIEL, Chief District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Chad Sayler's Second Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim, filed October 27, 2011 [ECF No. 14]. Plaintiff filed his complaint in this matter on August 5, 2011. On October 11, 2011, Defendants Vargo & Janson, P.C. and John P. Vargo filed an amended answer and counterclaims. Defendants asserted a breach of contract counterclaim against Plaintiff and an abuse of process counterclaim against Plaintiff and third-pa
Summary: ORDER WILEY Y. DANIEL, Chief District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Chad Sayler's Second Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim, filed October 27, 2011 [ECF No. 14]. Plaintiff filed his complaint in this matter on August 5, 2011. On October 11, 2011, Defendants Vargo & Janson, P.C. and John P. Vargo filed an amended answer and counterclaims. Defendants asserted a breach of contract counterclaim against Plaintiff and an abuse of process counterclaim against Plaintiff and third-par..
More
ORDER
WILEY Y. DANIEL, Chief District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Chad Sayler's Second Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim, filed October 27, 2011 [ECF No. 14].
Plaintiff filed his complaint in this matter on August 5, 2011. On October 11, 2011, Defendants Vargo & Janson, P.C. and John P. Vargo filed an amended answer and counterclaims. Defendants asserted a breach of contract counterclaim against Plaintiff and an abuse of process counterclaim against Plaintiff and third-party Defendant Matthew R. Osborne [ECF No. 11]. In the instant motion, Plaintiff requests dismissal of the abuse of process counterclaim. In response, Defendants note that Mr. Osborne was dismissed from this action on December 8, 2011, and state that they do not oppose dismissal with prejudice of the abuse of process counterclaim against Plaintiff.
Therefore, Plaintiff Chad Sayler's Second Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim, filed October 27, 2011 [ECF No. 14] is GRANTED, and the abuse of process counterclaim set forth in Defendants amended answer and counterclaims is dismissed with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
