HEALTH GRADES, INC. v. MDX MEDICAL, INC., 11-cv-00520-PAB-BNB. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20120127g85
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 25, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2012
Summary: ORDER BOYD N. BOLAND, Magistrate Judge. This matter arises on MDx Medical, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to Amend Invalidity Contentions [Doc. # 97, filed 12/21/2011] (the "Motion"). I held a hearing on the Motion this morning, at which time the parties informed me that they have reached an agreement on the matters in dispute. Consistent with the parties' agreement, IT IS ORDERED: (1) The Motion [Doc. # 97] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: • GRANTED to allow the supplementation
Summary: ORDER BOYD N. BOLAND, Magistrate Judge. This matter arises on MDx Medical, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to Amend Invalidity Contentions [Doc. # 97, filed 12/21/2011] (the "Motion"). I held a hearing on the Motion this morning, at which time the parties informed me that they have reached an agreement on the matters in dispute. Consistent with the parties' agreement, IT IS ORDERED: (1) The Motion [Doc. # 97] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: • GRANTED to allow the supplementation ..
More
ORDER
BOYD N. BOLAND, Magistrate Judge.
This matter arises on MDx Medical, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to Amend Invalidity Contentions [Doc. # 97, filed 12/21/2011] (the "Motion"). I held a hearing on the Motion this morning, at which time the parties informed me that they have reached an agreement on the matters in dispute. Consistent with the parties' agreement,
IT IS ORDERED:
(1) The Motion [Doc. # 97] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:
• GRANTED to allow the supplementation as specified in MDX Medical, Inc.'s Second Supplemental Invalidity Contentions [etc.] [Doc. # 122-1]; and
• DENIED without prejudice insofar as MDX seeks leave to make future, additional, and unspecified amendments.
Source: Leagle
