MORGAN KEEGAN & COMPANY, INC. v. PESSEL, 11-cv-03293-RPM. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20120131d35
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 31, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2012
Summary: ORDER MODIFYING RULE 16 PROCEDURE — ARBITRATION AWARD RICHARD P. MATSCH, Senior District Judge. Because this is an action brought to vacate an award by an arbitration panel in a FINRA Dispute Resolution Proceeding and defendants counter petition to affirm the award, no scheduling conference under Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 is necessary. As an alternative, it is ORDERED: That on or before February 29, 2012, counsel for the parties shall file a joint statement addressing the f
Summary: ORDER MODIFYING RULE 16 PROCEDURE — ARBITRATION AWARD RICHARD P. MATSCH, Senior District Judge. Because this is an action brought to vacate an award by an arbitration panel in a FINRA Dispute Resolution Proceeding and defendants counter petition to affirm the award, no scheduling conference under Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 is necessary. As an alternative, it is ORDERED: That on or before February 29, 2012, counsel for the parties shall file a joint statement addressing the fo..
More
ORDER MODIFYING RULE 16 PROCEDURE — ARBITRATION AWARD
RICHARD P. MATSCH, Senior District Judge.
Because this is an action brought to vacate an award by an arbitration panel in a FINRA Dispute Resolution Proceeding and defendants counter petition to affirm the award, no scheduling conference under Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 is necessary. As an alternative, it is
ORDERED:
That on or before February 29, 2012, counsel for the parties shall file a joint statement addressing the following matters:
1. Whether the papers already on file provide sufficient information to decide the issues.
2. Whether any discovery is necessary.
3. Submit a briefing schedule.
If there is disagreement on any of these matters, the Court will set a conference to resolve the disputes.
Source: Leagle
