UNDERWOOD v. THE GEO GROUP, INC., 10-cv-00306-LTB-KLM. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20120221791
Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 17, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 17, 2012
Summary: ORDER LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Judge. As further set forth on the record at the hearing held on February 17, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant's Motion to Strike Certain Opinions from Plaintiff's Expert Witness and to Preclude Testimony on Certain Test Given to Plaintiff [Doc #77] is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's case-in-chief and CONDITIONALLY GRANTED, see Fed. R. Evid. 103(a), with respect to Plaintiff's rebuttal; 2. Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 402, 403 & 702, Dr. Atwell s
Summary: ORDER LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Judge. As further set forth on the record at the hearing held on February 17, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant's Motion to Strike Certain Opinions from Plaintiff's Expert Witness and to Preclude Testimony on Certain Test Given to Plaintiff [Doc #77] is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's case-in-chief and CONDITIONALLY GRANTED, see Fed. R. Evid. 103(a), with respect to Plaintiff's rebuttal; 2. Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 402, 403 & 702, Dr. Atwell sh..
More
ORDER
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Judge.
As further set forth on the record at the hearing held on February 17, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant's Motion to Strike Certain Opinions from Plaintiff's Expert Witness and to Preclude Testimony on Certain Test Given to Plaintiff [Doc #77] is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's case-in-chief and CONDITIONALLY GRANTED, see Fed. R. Evid. 103(a), with respect to Plaintiff's rebuttal;
2. Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 402, 403 & 702, Dr. Atwell shall not be permitted to testify on any issue during Plaintiff's case-in-chief but may, depending on the defense presented, be permitted to testify during Plaintiff's rebuttal as deemed appropriate by the Court; and
3. On or before February 23, 2012, in addition to the other materials already requested by the Court, the parties shall submit (a) revised witness and exhibit lists; and (b) short trial briefs addressing the "protected activity" element of Plainitff's retaliation claim in light of my summary judgment order dated November 17, 2011.
Source: Leagle
