ALVES v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, 12-cv-00081-LTB-BNB. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20120402645
Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 29, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2012
Summary: ORDER LEWIS T. BABCOCK, District Judge. THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second and Third Claim for Relief (Doc 10 — filed March 28, 2012), and the Court being fully advised in the premises, it is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff's Second and Third Claims for Relief shall be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, each party to pay their own fees and costs. This Order does not affect Plaintiff's First Claim for Relief for Breach of Contract — Und
Summary: ORDER LEWIS T. BABCOCK, District Judge. THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second and Third Claim for Relief (Doc 10 — filed March 28, 2012), and the Court being fully advised in the premises, it is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff's Second and Third Claims for Relief shall be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, each party to pay their own fees and costs. This Order does not affect Plaintiff's First Claim for Relief for Breach of Contract — Unde..
More
ORDER
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, District Judge.
THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second and Third Claim for Relief (Doc 10 — filed March 28, 2012), and the Court being fully advised in the premises, it is therefore
ORDERED that Plaintiff's Second and Third Claims for Relief shall be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, each party to pay their own fees and costs. This Order does not affect Plaintiff's First Claim for Relief for Breach of Contract — Underinsured Motorist (UIM) benefits.
Source: Leagle