Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

PODDAR v. UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, 11-cv-3009-BAPP. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20120405a22
Filed: Apr. 04, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 04, 2012
Summary: ORDER JOHN L. KANE, Senior District Judge. This matter is currently before me on Plaintiff Rohit Poddar's Motion for Immediate Stay (doc. 40). Although voluminous, rambling, and at times unintelligible I liberally construe his pro se pleadings. Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106 , 1110 (10th Cir. 1991). As best I can surmise, Mr. Poddar is appealing Chief Bankruptcy Judge Howard R. Tallman's Order denying his Motion for a Stay Pending Appeal. Doc. 194, 11-bk-23444 (Bankr. D. Colo. March 23, 2
More

ORDER

JOHN L. KANE, Senior District Judge.

This matter is currently before me on Plaintiff Rohit Poddar's Motion for Immediate Stay (doc. 40). Although voluminous, rambling, and at times unintelligible I liberally construe his pro se pleadings. Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991). As best I can surmise, Mr. Poddar is appealing Chief Bankruptcy Judge Howard R. Tallman's Order denying his Motion for a Stay Pending Appeal. Doc. 194, 11-bk-23444 (Bankr. D. Colo. March 23, 2012).

Mr. Poddar argues that Judge Tallman "erred in applicating [sic] the facts in the right perspective and did not look at the fraud committed by the trustee and the attorney by selling the land fraudulently." Motion for Immediate Stay (doc. 40) at 2. Notwithstanding Mr. Poddar's repeated and strenuous objections, Judge Tallman's findings of fact may not be set aside unless Mr. Poddar establishes that they were clearly erroneous. Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8013.

I have reviewed Mr. Poddar's filing and find no basis for upsetting Judge Tallman's findings of fact. Accordingly, Mr. Poddar's Motion for Immediate Stay is DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer