Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CALBART v. DENVER SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, 10-cv-01385-LTB-CBS. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20120413655 Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 12, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 12, 2012
Summary: ORDER LEWIS T. BABCOCK, District Judge. This case is before me on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc 137) be granted and that judgment on the Third Amended Complaint be granted in favor of Defendants Denver Sheriff Department and Deputy Sheriff Wise and against Plaintiff. The Magistrate Judge further recommends that Defendant Burke be dismissed from this action without prejudice. Plaintiff has now filed timely written objections. Accor
More

ORDER

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, District Judge.

This case is before me on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc 137) be granted and that judgment on the Third Amended Complaint be granted in favor of Defendants Denver Sheriff Department and Deputy Sheriff Wise and against Plaintiff. The Magistrate Judge further recommends that Defendant Burke be dismissed from this action without prejudice. Plaintiff has now filed timely written objections.

Accordingly I have reviewed the Recommendation de novo in light of the file and record in this action. I note that Plaintiff concedes that his claim under the American With Disabilities Act is moot and should be dismissed. On de novo review, I conclude that the thorough and comprehensive analysis in the Recommendation is correct.

Plaintiff has also filed his "Motion for Leave to File Amended Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment" (Doc 177). He has also filed a "Motion to Submit New Evidence on Review" (Doc 172) together with his affidavit and an Amended Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary judgment. The de novo review of the Recommendation is upon the record before the Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff is not entitled to a second bite of the apple.

Accordingly

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary judgment (Doc 137) is GRANTED and that judgment on the Third Amended Complaint is granted I favor of Defendants Denver Sheriff Department and Deputy Sheriff Wise and against Plaintiff.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Burke is DISMISSED from this action without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to File Amended Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc 177) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Submit New Evidence (Doc 172) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Amended Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc 176) is STRICKEN AS UNTIMELY.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer