U.S. v. $183,020.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 07-cv-01291-PAB-MEH. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20120427775
Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2012
Summary: ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on a review of the docket. The parties have included as part of the Settlement Agreement [Docket No. 50] filed in this case an automated payment enrollment form which includes the social security number of a claimant. As such, the filing appears to violate Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a). Therefore, it is ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement [Docket No. 50] shall be restricted at Level One. It is further ORDERED that, on or
Summary: ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on a review of the docket. The parties have included as part of the Settlement Agreement [Docket No. 50] filed in this case an automated payment enrollment form which includes the social security number of a claimant. As such, the filing appears to violate Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a). Therefore, it is ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement [Docket No. 50] shall be restricted at Level One. It is further ORDERED that, on or b..
More
ORDER
PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on a review of the docket. The parties have included as part of the Settlement Agreement [Docket No. 50] filed in this case an automated payment enrollment form which includes the social security number of a claimant. As such, the filing appears to violate Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a).
Therefore, it is
ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement [Docket No. 50] shall be restricted at Level One. It is further
ORDERED that, on or before 5:00 p.m. on Friday, April 27, 2012, Evan Sanders shall indicate whether he waives the protections of Rule 5.2(a) and, if not, the plaintiff shall re-file without restrictions a redacted copy of Docket No. 50 that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a).
Source: Leagle
