Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MARTIN v. ESTASTE OF AUSTIN KRAAL, 11-cv-02611-PAB-MEH. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20120508664 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 07, 2012
Latest Update: May 07, 2012
Summary: ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Notice of Dismissal of Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company [Docket No. 23], in which plaintiff requests dismissal of defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Despite Rule 41(a)(1)'s reference to the dismissal of an "action," the weight of authority permits a dismissal of all claims pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A) against fewer than all de
More

ORDER

PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Notice of Dismissal of Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company [Docket No. 23], in which plaintiff requests dismissal of defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Despite Rule 41(a)(1)'s reference to the dismissal of an "action," the weight of authority permits a dismissal of all claims pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A) against fewer than all defendants. See Montoya v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., 614 F.3d 145, 148 (5th Cir. 2010); Blaize-Sampeur v. McDowell, 2007 WL 1958909, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. June 29, 2007) (noting that, although the Second Circuit had previously stated otherwise, it had "since adopted the approach of the majority of courts in other circuits — that is, that Rule 41(a) does not require dismissal of the action in its entirety" and permits dismissal of all claims as to a single defendant). Upon the filing of the Notice of Dismissal [Docket No. 23], this action was dismissed without prejudice as to defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer