Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC. v. MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC., 12-cv-00331-REB. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20120517833 Visitors: 3
Filed: May 16, 2012
Latest Update: May 16, 2012
Summary: ORDER ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, District Judge. The matter is before me on Plaintiff Chipolte Mexican Grill, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion To Stay Pending Resolution of MDL Motion For Transfer and Consolidation Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, or in The Alternative To Vacate and Reset Briefing on Markman Issues [#16] 1 filed May 15, 2012. After reviewing the motion and the file, I conclude that the motion should be granted. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That Plaintiff Chipolte Mexican Grill
More

ORDER

ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, District Judge.

The matter is before me on Plaintiff Chipolte Mexican Grill, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion To Stay Pending Resolution of MDL Motion For Transfer and Consolidation Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, or in The Alternative To Vacate and Reset Briefing on Markman Issues [#16]1 filed May 15, 2012. After reviewing the motion and the file, I conclude that the motion should be granted.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That Plaintiff Chipolte Mexican Grill, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion To Stay Pending Resolution of MDL Motion For Transfer and Consolidation Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, or in The Alternative To Vacate and Reset Briefing on Markman Issues [#16] filed May 15, 2012, is GRANTED;

2. That this case is STAYED, pending a decision on Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.'s Motion For Transfer and Consolidation Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 in MDL Action No. 2354 (In re Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., MDL No. 2354 (MDL Feb. 23, 2012));

3. That the briefing schedule prescribed in the court's Order For Briefing on Markman Issues [#6] entered February 9, 2012, is VACATED; and

4. That in the event that Maxim's MDL motion is denied, the parties shall promptly file a joint status report advising the court of the denial and the resultant status of this case.

FootNotes


1. "[#16]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer