POTTER VOICE TECHNOLOGIES LLC, v. APPLE, INC., 12-cv-01096-REB-CBX. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20120622989
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 21, 2012
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC., ONLY ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, District Judge. The matter is before me on Potter Voice Technologies LLC's Notice of Dismissal of Motorola Solutions, Inc. [#84] 1 filed June 20, 2012. After reviewing the notice and the record, I conclude that the notice should be approved and that plaintiff's claims against defendant Motorola Solutions, Inc. should be dismissed. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That Potter Voice Technologies LLC's Notice of Di
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC., ONLY ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, District Judge. The matter is before me on Potter Voice Technologies LLC's Notice of Dismissal of Motorola Solutions, Inc. [#84] 1 filed June 20, 2012. After reviewing the notice and the record, I conclude that the notice should be approved and that plaintiff's claims against defendant Motorola Solutions, Inc. should be dismissed. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That Potter Voice Technologies LLC's Notice of Dis..
More
ORDER DISMISSING MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC., ONLY
ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, District Judge.
The matter is before me on Potter Voice Technologies LLC's Notice of Dismissal of Motorola Solutions, Inc. [#84]1 filed June 20, 2012. After reviewing the notice and the record, I conclude that the notice should be approved and that plaintiff's claims against defendant Motorola Solutions, Inc. should be dismissed.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That Potter Voice Technologies LLC's Notice of Dismissal of Motorola Solutions, Inc. [#84] filed June 20, 2012, is APPROVED;
2. That plaintiff's claims against defendant Motorola Solutions, Inc. Are DISMISSED; and
3. That defendant Motorola Solutions, Inc. is DROPPED as a named party to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly.
FootNotes
1. "[#84]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.
Source: Leagle
