MAGLUTA v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, 11-cv-02381-PAB-KLM. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20120627a19
Visitors: 24
Filed: Jun. 25, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2012
Summary: ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal [Docket No. 54], in which he states that he "files his Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to the Defendant Patrick Whalen" "pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure." Despite Rule 41(a)(1)'s reference to the dismissal of an "action," the weight of authority permits a dismissal of all claims pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A) against fewer than all defend
Summary: ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal [Docket No. 54], in which he states that he "files his Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to the Defendant Patrick Whalen" "pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure." Despite Rule 41(a)(1)'s reference to the dismissal of an "action," the weight of authority permits a dismissal of all claims pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A) against fewer than all defenda..
More
ORDER
PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal [Docket No. 54], in which he states that he "files his Notice of Voluntary Dismissal as to the Defendant Patrick Whalen" "pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure."
Despite Rule 41(a)(1)'s reference to the dismissal of an "action," the weight of authority permits a dismissal of all claims pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A) against fewer than all defendants. See Montoya v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., 614 F.3d 145, 148 (5th Cir. 2010); Blaize-Sampeur v. McDowell, 2007 WL 1958909, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. June 29, 2007) (noting that, although the Second Circuit had previously stated otherwise, it had "since adopted the approach of the majority of courts in other circuits — that is, that Rule 41(a) does not require dismissal of the action in its entirety" and permits dismissal of all claims as to a single defendant). Upon the filing of plaintiff's notice [Docket No. 54], this action was dismissed without prejudice as to defendant Patrick Whalen.
Source: Leagle
