Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

GUTIERREZ v. ASTRUE, 12-cv-01668-AP. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20121030b45 Visitors: 20
Filed: Oct. 29, 2012
Latest Update: Oct. 29, 2012
Summary: JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES JOHN L. KANE, District Judge. 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES 2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g). 3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. Date Complaint Was Filed: June 26, 2012 B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: August 8, 2012 C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Fi
More

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

JOHN L. KANE, District Judge.

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: June 26, 2012

B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: August 8, 2012

C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: October 9, 2012

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

At this time, the Administrative Record appears to be complete and accurate; the parties will fully ascertain the completeness of the record upon the drafting and completion of their respective briefs.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

The parties do not foresee offering any unusual claims or defenses in this case.

7. OTHER MATTERS

The parties are not aware of any other matters at this time.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Counsel for both parties agree to the following proposed briefing schedule:

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: December 10, 2012

B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: January 9, 2013

C. Plaintiffs Reply Brief (If Any) Due: January 24, 2013

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiff's Statement:

Plaintiff does not request oral argument.

B. Defendant's Statement:

Defendant does not request oral argument

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

A. () All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

B. (X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

11. OTHER MATTERS

The parties filing motions for extension of time or continuances must comply with D.C.Colo.LCivR. 7.1(c) by submitting proof that a copy of the motion has been served upon the moving attorney's client, all attorneys of record, and all pro se parties.

12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer