Filed: Nov. 16, 2012
Latest Update: Nov. 16, 2012
Summary: JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES JOHN L. KANE, District Judge. 1. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION This is an appeal of a Social Security benefits application. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g). 2. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. Date Complaint Was Filed: July 12, 2012 B. Date Complaint was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: August 28, 2012 C. Date Answer and Admi
Summary: JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES JOHN L. KANE, District Judge. 1. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION This is an appeal of a Social Security benefits application. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g). 2. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. Date Complaint Was Filed: July 12, 2012 B. Date Complaint was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: August 28, 2012 C. Date Answer and Admin..
More
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
JOHN L. KANE, District Judge.
1. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
This is an appeal of a Social Security benefits application. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
2. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A. Date Complaint Was Filed: July 12, 2012
B. Date Complaint was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: August 28, 2012
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: October 26, 2012
3. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and accurate.
4. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Neither party intends to submit additional evidence.
5. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe this case raises any unusual claims or defenses.
6. OTHER MATTERS
The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court.
7. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Counsel for both parties conferred and agreed upon the following proposed briefing schedule:
A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief: December 26, 2012
B. Response Brief due: January 25, 2013
C. Reply Brief due: February 11, 2013
8. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.
9. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A. ( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
B. (X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
10. OTHER MATTERS
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.
