Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

RUCKDESCHEL v. COLVIN, 13-cv-02803-AP. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20140205a19 Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Feb. 04, 2014
Summary: JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES JOHN L. KANE, District Judge. 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: ALAN M. AGEE 512 S. 8th Street Colorado Springs, CO 80905 (719) 473-1515 ageealanmpc@qwestoffice.net For Defendant: JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney J. BENEDICT GARC A Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado THOMAS H. KRAUS Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration,
More

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

JOHN L. KANE, District Judge.

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff: ALAN M. AGEE 512 S. 8th Street Colorado Springs, CO 80905 (719) 473-1515 ageealanmpc@qwestoffice.net For Defendant: JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney J. BENEDICT GARCÍA Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado THOMAS H. KRAUS Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration, Region VIII Office of the General Counsel 1961 Stout St., Ste. 4169 Denver, CO 80294-4003 (303) 844-0017 tom.kraus@ssa.gov

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: 10/14/13 B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 10/18/13 C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 12/15/13

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

Plaintiff's Statement: The request for review of hearing decision was filed on 7/27/13. The request for Review requested additional time to submit additional evidence. It appears that the Appeals Council made a mistake and denied review on 8/20/13. Accordingly, Plaintiff has additional evidence to submit which will be addressed in either a motion or made part of the argument in the opening brief.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

A. Plaintiff's Statement: None anticipated. B. Defendant's Statement: None anticipated.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

This case does not involve unusually complicated or out-of-the-ordinary claims.

7. OTHER MATTERS

None.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: 3/26/14 B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: 4/30/14 C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 5/14/14

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff requests Oral Argument. B. Defendant's Statement: Oral Argument is not requested.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

A. () All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. B. (X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

11. OTHER MATTERS

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.

12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer