Filed: Mar. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2014
Summary: JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES JOHN L. KANE, District Judge. 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff : Michael W. Seckar 402 W. 12th Street Pueblo, CO 81003 719-543-8636 719-543-8403 (facsimile) seckarlaw@mindspring.com. For Defendant : John F. Walsh United States Attorney J. Benedict Garc a Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office J.B.Garcia@usdoj.gov Allan D. Berger Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Securi
Summary: JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES JOHN L. KANE, District Judge. 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff : Michael W. Seckar 402 W. 12th Street Pueblo, CO 81003 719-543-8636 719-543-8403 (facsimile) seckarlaw@mindspring.com. For Defendant : John F. Walsh United States Attorney J. Benedict Garc a Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office J.B.Garcia@usdoj.gov Allan D. Berger Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Securit..
More
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
JOHN L. KANE, District Judge.
1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Michael W. Seckar
402 W. 12th Street
Pueblo, CO 81003
719-543-8636
719-543-8403 (facsimile)
seckarlaw@mindspring.com.
For Defendant:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
J. Benedict García
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
J.B.Garcia@usdoj.gov
Allan D. Berger
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration, Region VIII
Office of the General Counsel
1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294
303-844-2149
303-844-0770 (facsimile)
Allan.berger@ssa.gov
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A. Date Complaint Was Filed: November 12, 2013
B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: November 14, 2013
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: February 21, 2014
4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
To the best of his knowledge, Plaintiff states that the record is complete and accurate.
To the best of her knowledge, Defendant states that the record is complete and accurate.
5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.
6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES
The parties state that this case does not raise unusual claims or defenses.
7. OTHER MATTERS
The parties state that there are no other matters.
8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: April 22, 2014
B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: May 22, 2014
C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: June 6, 2014
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.
10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Indicate below the parties' consent choice.
A. () All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
B. (X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.
