HARTLEY v. TIME WARNER NY CABLE LLC, 13-cv-00158-RM-MJW. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20140408742
Visitors: 18
Filed: Apr. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2014
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. WATANABE, Magistrate Judge. After reviewing The Harman Firm P.C.'s Motion to Quash Subpoena (docket no. 135), the Response Brief (docket no. 138), and the Reply (docket no. 139), it is hereby ORDERED that on or before April 15, 2014, The Harman Firm P.C. shall file with the court at restricted access Level 2 and consistent with D.C.COLO.LCivR. 7.2 those documents requested in the subject subpoena for in camera review by this court. This court will reserve ruling on The Harma
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. WATANABE, Magistrate Judge. After reviewing The Harman Firm P.C.'s Motion to Quash Subpoena (docket no. 135), the Response Brief (docket no. 138), and the Reply (docket no. 139), it is hereby ORDERED that on or before April 15, 2014, The Harman Firm P.C. shall file with the court at restricted access Level 2 and consistent with D.C.COLO.LCivR. 7.2 those documents requested in the subject subpoena for in camera review by this court. This court will reserve ruling on The Harman..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL J. WATANABE, Magistrate Judge.
After reviewing The Harman Firm P.C.'s Motion to Quash Subpoena (docket no. 135), the Response Brief (docket no. 138), and the Reply (docket no. 139), it is hereby ORDERED that on or before April 15, 2014, The Harman Firm P.C. shall file with the court at restricted access Level 2 and consistent with D.C.COLO.LCivR. 7.2 those documents requested in the subject subpoena for in camera review by this court. This court will reserve ruling on The Harman Firm P.C.'s Motion to Quash Subpoena (docket no. 135) until after this court reviews the requested documents per the subject subpoena in camera.
Source: Leagle
