Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. OCHOA-MURO, 12-cr-00212-PAB. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20140411814 Visitors: 28
Filed: Apr. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2014
Summary: PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING JENCKS ACT, RULE 26.2, RULE 49.1, AND RULE 16 MATERIAL PHILIP A. BRIMMER, Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Government's Motion for Protective Order for Jencks Act, Rule 26.2, Rule 49.1, and Rule 16 Material [Docket No. 15]. For good cause, the Court may enter a protective order regulating discovery in a criminal case pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(d) and the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. 1651. The government has expressed concern that discovery materi
More

PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING JENCKS ACT, RULE 26.2, RULE 49.1, AND RULE 16 MATERIAL

PHILIP A. BRIMMER, Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the Government's Motion for Protective Order for Jencks Act, Rule 26.2, Rule 49.1, and Rule 16 Material [Docket No. 15].

For good cause, the Court may enter a protective order regulating discovery in a criminal case pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(d) and the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651.

The government has expressed concern that discovery materials containing photographs, voice recordings, or personal identifying information regarding persons who may become witnesses in this case should not be left in the exclusive custody of the defendant. The government cites concerns for witness safety that could stem from the unauthorized publication, duplication, or circulation of these documents. In the context of pretrial discovery, the Court finds that the government's concerns have merit, that the burden on the defense is not extensive, and that encouraging the early disclosure of Jencks Act material may encourage the fair resolution of defendant's case. Being now sufficiently advised in the premises, the Court finds that it is in the best interests of justice to grant the government's Motion for Protective Order. It is therefore

ORDERED that the Government's Motion for Protective Order for Jencks Act, Rule 26.2, Rule 49.1, and Rule 16 Material [Docket No. 15] is GRANTED. It is further

ORDERED that Jencks Act material, including witness statements and reports of witness statements or debriefings, and recordings or transcripts of witness statements or testimony; discovery material subject to Fed. R. Crim. P. 26.2; Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1 material; Fed. R. Crim. P. 16 material, including photographs of persons who are or may become witnesses, video and audio files of any such persons, NCIC/CCIC reports, Social Security numbers, addresses, and telephone numbers, furnished to defense counsel of record in this case, shall be used by the defense only for official purposes related to judicial proceedings in this case and for no other purpose. It is further

ORDERED that Jencks Act material, Fed. R. Crim. P. 26.2 material, Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1 material, and Rule 16 materials subject to this Order that are produced by the government to defense counsel of record shall remain in the physical custody and control of counsel, its employees, and/or its professional associates and, although defendant may review such materials, they shall not be left in the exclusive custody of the defendant. It is further

ORDERED that, unless defense counsel and the government come to a specific understanding to the contrary, the Jencks Act material, Rule 26.2 material, Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1 material, and Rule 16 material that are subject to this Order which is disclosed to the defense, including disclosures made through the use of electronic media, shall not be copied (except for internal purposes related to this case), reproduced, published or publicly circulated by the defense without further order of the Court or until its use in judicial proceedings at the time of trial or in official hearings or proceedings related to this case. It is further

ORDERED that, in the event defendant and the government agree that certain materials or documents should be exempted from the limits otherwise imposed by this Order, they may do so by mutual agreement. In the event that defendant and the government disagree or are unclear about the meaning or application of this Order with respect to some document, photograph, or other material in the case, the parties may bring the issue to the attention of the Court. It is further

ORDERED that, at the conclusion of the case, the materials subject to this Order shall be returned to the government.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer