Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BERTRAM v. COLVIN, 14-cv-00031-AP. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20140414758 Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2014
Summary: JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES JOHN L. KANE, District Judge. 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: For Defendant: Patrick C.H. Spencer, II Jessica Milano 830 Tenderfoot Hill Road, Suite 320 Special Assistant United States Attorney Colorado Springs, CO 80906 Assistant Regional Counsel (719) 632-4808 Office of the General Counsel (719) 632-48
More

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

JOHN L. KANE, District Judge.

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff: For Defendant: Patrick C.H. Spencer, II Jessica Milano 830 Tenderfoot Hill Road, Suite 320 Special Assistant United States Attorney Colorado Springs, CO 80906 Assistant Regional Counsel (719) 632-4808 Office of the General Counsel (719) 632-4807 (fax) Social Security Administration patrick@2spencers.com 1961 Stout St., Suite 4169 Denver, CO 80294-4003 (303) 844-7136 (303) 844-0770 (fax) jessica.milano@ssa.gov

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: January 5, 2014 B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: January 23, 2014 C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: March 21, 2014

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and accurate.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

Neither party intends to submit additional evidence.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe this case raises any unusual claims or defenses.

7. OTHER MATTERS

The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court. This case is not on appeal from a decision issued on remand from this Court.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Counsel for both parties conferred and agreed upon the following proposed briefing schedule:

A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: May 20, 2014 B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: June 19, 2014 C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: July 7, 2014

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument. B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

A. ( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. B. (X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer