Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MITCHELL v. EL PUEBLO BOYS AND GIRLS RANCH, INC., 14-cv-01068-WYD-BNB. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20141009973 Visitors: 18
Filed: Oct. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2014
Summary: ORDER BOYD N. BOLAND, Magistrate Judge. Pending is the Motion to Stay From Defendant Cindy Howard [Doc. # 37, filed 9/24/2014] (the "Motion to Stay"). I held a hearing on the Motion to Stay this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. IT IS ORDERED: (1) The Motion to Stay [Doc. # 37] is GRANTED as follows: All discovery is stayed except discovery directed to El Pueblo Boys and Girls Ranch, Inc., and/or Sherri Baca, which discovery is limited to identifying the
More

ORDER

BOYD N. BOLAND, Magistrate Judge.

Pending is the Motion to Stay From Defendant Cindy Howard [Doc. # 37, filed 9/24/2014] (the "Motion to Stay"). I held a hearing on the Motion to Stay this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here.

IT IS ORDERED:

(1) The Motion to Stay [Doc. # 37] is GRANTED as follows: All discovery is stayed except discovery directed to El Pueblo Boys and Girls Ranch, Inc., and/or Sherri Baca, which discovery is limited to identifying the John and Jane Does described in the Amended Complaint.

(2) The plaintiffs are allowed to serve no more than five interrogatories and five requests for production, the scope of which is limited to identifying the John and Jane Does described in the Amended Complaint. After the written discovery is completed and after the parties have conferred, the plaintiffs may, if necessary, take not more than one Rule 30(b)(6) deposition limited to identifying the John and Jane Does described in the Amended Complaint.

(3) The discovery directed at identifying the John and Jane Does described in the Amended Complaint shall be completed by not later than November 21, 2014.

(4) The parties shall file status reports as follows:

(a) On or before December 12, 2014, concerning the attempts to identify the John and Jane Does described in the Amended Complaint and the plaintiffs intentions with respect to additional amendment to add the John and Jane Does; and

(b) Within ten days of any ruling on the Motion to Dismiss From Defendant Howard [Doc. # 17] notifying me of the ruling and addressing any additional pretrial proceedings which may be required.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer