GREASE MONKEY INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. VALENZUELA, 12-cv-00526-MSK-BNB. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20141204892
Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 03, 2014
Summary: ORDER BOYD N. BOLAND, Magistrate Judge. This matter arises in connection with the Order to Show Cause [Doc. # 35] entered on October 30, 2014. In its Response [Doc. # 36], the plaintiff sought affirmative relief as follows: If the Central Authority in Mexico does not serve process on Defendants at their residence addresses, then the Court should enter an order allowing Grease Monkey to serve Defendants through email addresses or social media if possible. Grease Monkey will serve Defendants wi
Summary: ORDER BOYD N. BOLAND, Magistrate Judge. This matter arises in connection with the Order to Show Cause [Doc. # 35] entered on October 30, 2014. In its Response [Doc. # 36], the plaintiff sought affirmative relief as follows: If the Central Authority in Mexico does not serve process on Defendants at their residence addresses, then the Court should enter an order allowing Grease Monkey to serve Defendants through email addresses or social media if possible. Grease Monkey will serve Defendants wit..
More
ORDER
BOYD N. BOLAND, Magistrate Judge.
This matter arises in connection with the Order to Show Cause [Doc. # 35] entered on October 30, 2014. In its Response [Doc. # 36], the plaintiff sought affirmative relief as follows:
If the Central Authority in Mexico does not serve process on Defendants at their residence addresses, then the Court should enter an order allowing Grease Monkey to serve Defendants through email addresses or social media if possible. Grease Monkey will serve Defendants with the Complaint and Summons in both English and Spanish. Grease Monkey requests an enlargement of time until Tuesday, March 3, 2015, to complete service of process through the Central Authority in Mexico pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(1), or through electronic mail or social media on Defendants pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3).
Local rule of practice 7.1(d), D.C.COLO.LCivR, prohibits a party from including a motion in a response or reply. Instead, "[a] motion shall be filed as a separate document." Id.
IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff shall seek relief from its service obligations, if at all, by an appropriate motion filed on or before December 17, 2014.
Source: Leagle
